This links to the home page
Art Law Blog
FILTERS
  • All Categories0
    • All Categories
    • 5 Pointz
    • Art Exhibitions
    • Art Galleries
    • Art Market
    • Auction
    • Authentication
    • Contracts
    • Copyright
    • Fair Use
    • Fine Art
    • Firm Update
    • Forfeiture
    • Forgeries
    • Foundations
    • Gagosian
    • Graffiti
    • Grossman LLP
    • James Castle
    • Legal Developments
    • Money Laundering
    • Museums
    • Native American Art
    • Nazi-looted Art
    • Ponzi Schemes
    • Provenance
    • Public Art
    • Richard Prince
    • Stolen Artwork
    • Street Art
    • Trademark
    • Uncategorized
    • VARA
  • All Attorneys0
    • All Attorneys
    • Judd B. Grossman
    • Kate Lucas
    • Webster D. McBride
    • Emily Andersen
    • Jacquie Jakimowicz
  • All Practices0
    • All Practices
    • Art Law
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Securities Litigation
  • All Months0
    • All Months
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • October 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
  • Fifth Circuit Reinstates Injunction on the Corporate Transparency Act
    01/08/2025
     January 31, 2025 Update: As of January 23, the Corporate Transparency Act injunction remains in effect.  This means that, for now, reporting companies are not required to file beneficial ownership reports and will not face penalties for noncompliance, although voluntary filings are still permitted.
    Recent UpdateOn December 26, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reinstated the injunction halting enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), again suspending the need to report beneficial ownership or update previously submitted reports.  Given the ongoing uncertainty around the CTA, reporting companies should prepare BOI reports in advance for prompt filing should requirements be restored.
    Prior Update: On December 23, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals lifted the injunction, extending most filing deadlines under the Corporate Transparency Act to January 13, 2025.  Companies should prepare to meet this deadline unless otherwise advised.
    On December 3, 2024, a Texas federal court ordered the government to temporarily cease enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act and its reporting regulations, requiring companies to disclose details about their principals.  So for the time being, businesses do not have to meet the January 1, 2025, reporting deadline.  But as a practical matter, businesses may still want to consider filing voluntarily (or at least preparing materials) now, to avoid paying penalties in the event the injunction is eventually vacated.  The CTA impacts the art market in several significant regards:  
     
    Confidentiality:  In the art market, confidentiality is paramount.  Many collectors and investors use holding companies or trusts to manage their art assets, often to maintain privacy.  The CTA aims to increase transparency in financial dealings by requiring companies to disclose their beneficial owners.  Enforcement of the CTA could require disclosure of ownership interests in corporate entities created to buy, sell, invest in, and hold artwork, impacting the confidentiality enjoyed by businesses and high-net worth individuals in the space. 
     
    Compliance Burden: Many smaller art-related businesses (including entities connected with galleries, dealers, collectors, and investors in art) qualify as “reporting companies” under the CTA, and would be required to file beneficial ownership information (BOI), adding administrative and legal costs to their business models.  Moreover, the sweeping language of the statute adds compliance complexity and uncertainty; for example, it broadly defines “beneficial owner” as anyone who “indirectly…exercises substantial control” over a business or “receives substantial economic benefits” from it. Given that art businesses often operate with complex ownership structures and multiple stakeholders, entities currently have limited guidance for evaluating who might meet those criteria in a given organization.
     
    Anti-Money Laundering: Given the art industry’s culture of opacity, it has faced increasing scrutiny as governments seek ways to prevent the art market from being used as a possible avenue for money laundering.  The CTA aims to combat illicit financial activity by uncovering and identifying the true owners of art-related businesses. 
     
    In sum, the CTA directly affects the art market’s balance between privacy, transparency, and regulatory oversight, making this injunction a prominent development for industry stakeholders.  The government has already appealed the Texas ruling to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and there are other CTA-related lawsuits underway in other jurisdictions, including an appeal already pending.  In light of this continuing uncertainty surrounding the CTA, reporting companies should be aware that they can still make CTA filings voluntarily; alternatively, they may want to continue gathering information and preparing BOI reports and materials so that they are ready to file in the event that the requirements are reinstated.  We will continue to monitor developments in this space.
This links to the home page
Art Law Blog
  • Fifth Circuit Reinstates Injunction on the Corporate Transparency Act
    01/08/2025
     January 31, 2025 Update: As of January 23, the Corporate Transparency Act injunction remains in effect.  This means that, for now, reporting companies are not required to file beneficial ownership reports and will not face penalties for noncompliance, although voluntary filings are still permitted.
    Recent UpdateOn December 26, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reinstated the injunction halting enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), again suspending the need to report beneficial ownership or update previously submitted reports.  Given the ongoing uncertainty around the CTA, reporting companies should prepare BOI reports in advance for prompt filing should requirements be restored.
    Prior Update: On December 23, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals lifted the injunction, extending most filing deadlines under the Corporate Transparency Act to January 13, 2025.  Companies should prepare to meet this deadline unless otherwise advised.
    On December 3, 2024, a Texas federal court ordered the government to temporarily cease enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act and its reporting regulations, requiring companies to disclose details about their principals.  So for the time being, businesses do not have to meet the January 1, 2025, reporting deadline.  But as a practical matter, businesses may still want to consider filing voluntarily (or at least preparing materials) now, to avoid paying penalties in the event the injunction is eventually vacated.  The CTA impacts the art market in several significant regards:  
     
    Confidentiality:  In the art market, confidentiality is paramount.  Many collectors and investors use holding companies or trusts to manage their art assets, often to maintain privacy.  The CTA aims to increase transparency in financial dealings by requiring companies to disclose their beneficial owners.  Enforcement of the CTA could require disclosure of ownership interests in corporate entities created to buy, sell, invest in, and hold artwork, impacting the confidentiality enjoyed by businesses and high-net worth individuals in the space. 
     
    Compliance Burden: Many smaller art-related businesses (including entities connected with galleries, dealers, collectors, and investors in art) qualify as “reporting companies” under the CTA, and would be required to file beneficial ownership information (BOI), adding administrative and legal costs to their business models.  Moreover, the sweeping language of the statute adds compliance complexity and uncertainty; for example, it broadly defines “beneficial owner” as anyone who “indirectly…exercises substantial control” over a business or “receives substantial economic benefits” from it. Given that art businesses often operate with complex ownership structures and multiple stakeholders, entities currently have limited guidance for evaluating who might meet those criteria in a given organization.
     
    Anti-Money Laundering: Given the art industry’s culture of opacity, it has faced increasing scrutiny as governments seek ways to prevent the art market from being used as a possible avenue for money laundering.  The CTA aims to combat illicit financial activity by uncovering and identifying the true owners of art-related businesses. 
     
    In sum, the CTA directly affects the art market’s balance between privacy, transparency, and regulatory oversight, making this injunction a prominent development for industry stakeholders.  The government has already appealed the Texas ruling to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and there are other CTA-related lawsuits underway in other jurisdictions, including an appeal already pending.  In light of this continuing uncertainty surrounding the CTA, reporting companies should be aware that they can still make CTA filings voluntarily; alternatively, they may want to continue gathering information and preparing BOI reports and materials so that they are ready to file in the event that the requirements are reinstated.  We will continue to monitor developments in this space.